Asus WS660T

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus WS660T (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P10S WS
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170112
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '18 at 06:44
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 87.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 249 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 709 70% 575 Pts	64-Core 700 43% 700 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(107D 2769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.5% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 114 Parallax 93.5 82% 103 fps	MRender 98.6 Gravity 94.6 Splatting 100 80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 90GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 411 Write 175 Mixed 188 56% 258 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 15.4 66% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 39 DQ Mixed 8.38 27% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 63 82065208 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3330 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 134058383 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5773 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1623 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 589365281 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3352 (C2) HDA temperature 33 20 85899345953 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 3 1 82065208 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -126357937842556 (F1) Unknown 100 253 22608708450 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27636068430	72.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 130 Mixed 114 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.3 91% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 76.C105G.D100B 2x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 22.4 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 25.3 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS660T Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Asus WS660T

CPU
Xeon E3-1230 v6IntelBench 79%, 474 samples	1x
Xeon E3-1260L v5IntelBench 78%, 37 samples	1x
Xeon E3-1225 v5IntelBench 74%, 3,017 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P600NvidiaBench 16%, 3,885 samples	2x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GBIntel $160Bench 440%, 3,427 samples	1x

RAM
M391A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 41 samples	1x
M391A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 73%, 313 samples	1x
9965669-019.A00G 2x16GBKingstonBench 75%, 39 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359