Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '18 at 14:20
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 880
71% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,475
91% 1,475 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 98.9
51% 76.7 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 57.6
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-8i 18TB
992GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 43.9
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 19.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 122%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback