Packard EasyNote TM01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TM01  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV51_DN
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 01 '18 at 13:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P320-$20
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 64
36% 54 Pts
4-Core 63.4
8-Core 63.2
8% 63.3 Pts
64-Core 64.9
4% 64.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Acer(1025 036E) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.81
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.42 fps
MRender 0.52
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.44 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.29%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 58
Write 56.5
Mixed 55.3
43% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.31
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback