MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 31 '18 at 14:14
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 98
2-Core 195
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 385
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 32.5
25% 30.3 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 33.1
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 453
Write 181
Mixed 234
63% 289 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 14.2
70% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 52.7
70% 129 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 82%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
12GB free, PID c93a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Read 28.7
Write 8.25
Mixed 1.38
12% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.25
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-153.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-GD65 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback