Asrock P55 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P55 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 30 '18 at 14:55
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 80
2-Core 160
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 301
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 4069) 2GB
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 1602 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 43.6
28% 37.6 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 29.7
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
4GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.8% Poor
Read 159
Write 115
Mixed 133
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 6.64
39% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37.9
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 7.16
10% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 48%
Marvell Raid VD 0 319GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R Max speed: n/a
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock P55 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback