Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '18 at 22:01
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 143 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 286 38% 287 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.4 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 14.6 14% 15.2 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 17.4 12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 147 100 2963 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1585 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3014 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3065 (A9) Unknown 100 100 39 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3039 (AE) Unknown 100 100 336 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 66 100 249108103202 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 10 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 101 (E8) Unknown 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 629306 (F1) Unknown 253 253 11069 (F2) Unknown 253 253 15853	31% Below average	Read 163 Write 131 Mixed 143 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 2.5 54% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 2.57 12% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 86%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 552 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 290GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 26.1 Mixed 27.1 35% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.1 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	398x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	253x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	178x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	379x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16