HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '18 at 15:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 172
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 165
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 34
Parallax 42.4
39% 41.4 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 45
Splatting 40.3
35% 42.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
355GB free
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 18.5
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.42
82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS722580VLSA80 82GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V32OA6MA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 44
Mixed 22.4
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.32
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5773DH0-YH9 M378B5173DB0-CK0 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback