Acer Predator G9-593

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G9-593 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Mustang2_SKS
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161128
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '18 at 17:19
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 86 2-Core 159 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 384 43% 339 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Acer(1025 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.4% Average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 61.6 Parallax 56.2 46% 58 fps	MRender 58.5 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 54.6 45% 54.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 120GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 112GB free Firmware: 0103 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 419 Write 387 Mixed 398 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 18.2 77% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 39.9 59% 111 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 68%
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB 9,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: G871201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 100 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 478 (B1) Unknown 100 100 183662 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 88 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 123 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 21 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 267750 (F2) Unknown 100 100 112070	71.6% Very good	Read 471 Write 171 Mixed 209 62% 283 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 30.1 106% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 64.5 88% 163 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 62GB free Firmware: AX1P5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1750 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12347 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1209 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 477 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 15372 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 227633987616 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 575 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 190 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	35.1% Below average	Read 70.8 Write 51.4 Mixed 57.6 45% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.18 59% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 62%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 232GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 73.6 Write 70.2 Mixed 34.1 72% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.34 74% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GB 1,345 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.2% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 10.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G9-593 Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-593

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	215x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	132x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	201x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	159x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	3x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	47x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	39x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	31x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 11,019 samples	138x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	58x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16