Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170510
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '18 at 03:18
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 58.4 1-Core 134 2-Core 272 81% 155 Pts	4-Core 519 8-Core 515 69% 517 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 32 Parallax 39.5 34% 37.8 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 39 Splatting 37.3 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 478 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 189 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2854537452	96.8% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 397 Mixed 410 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 42.4 124% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 115 134% 235 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 169 4466 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 615 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 476 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 175 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 58 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2873 (C2) HDA temperature 129 116 18 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	74.2% Very good	Read 125 Write 133 Mixed 125 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.31 4K Mixed 0.21 104% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 156 7016 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1434 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4552 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 509 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 29 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1433 (C2) HDA temperature 132 91 18 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 9 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 9 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.5% Average	Read 91.2 Write 77.4 Mixed 72 60% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.37 105% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 929GB free Firmware: AX1P2C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1672 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2319 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 2426 (0A) Spinup retry count 146 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1886 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 82 51 303038482 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 550 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1048592 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 18874 (C2) HDA temperature 82 51 303038482 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62% Good	Read 106 Write 110 Mixed 105 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.21 75% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB-$48 7,720 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.9% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 10.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	462x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	213x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	121x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	112x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	43x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	82x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	61x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16