Lenovo 20B0000SCD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20B0000SCD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20B0000SCD
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '18 at 02:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 148
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 206
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8600M
Legend(17AA 220B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 23.20.15033.1003
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 8.75
5% 7.75 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 6.52
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LSS-24L6G 24GB
7GB free
Firmware: DSR2204 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 260
Write 63.2
Mixed 102
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 13.6
57% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 6.72
29% 66 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 87.6
Write 81.6
Mixed 86.4
64% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.16
72% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Elpida EDJ4216EFBG-GN-F 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback