Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150827
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '18 at 16:38
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 217 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 651 66% 533 Pts	64-Core 855 53% 855 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000 751 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Lighting 12.7 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 13.9 10% 15.1 fps	MRender 22.3 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 16.2 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEDMW012T4 1TB 1,068 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 342GB free Firmware: 8EV10171 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 2,185 Write 1,112 Mixed 1,508 353% 1,601 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 21.4 131% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 26 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 120 77% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 250%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18030 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 113 (B1) Unknown 97 1 173 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 58 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 68182853887	38.2% Below average	Read 512 Write 117 Mixed 196 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.91 40% 8.99 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 100 0 (03) Spinup time 185 100 9733 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 468 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15846 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 63 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 100 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 100 449 (C2) HDA temperature 121 107 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 100 0	100% Outstanding	Read 249 Write 101 Mixed 97.5 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.18 60% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 423GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 155 10833 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 279 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15787 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 102 (10) Unknown 14 186 252820822465 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 38 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 240 (C2) HDA temperature 123 105 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	82.2% Excellent	Read 169 Write 118 Mixed 117 101% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.16 48% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 8x8GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 42.8 MC Mixed 40.6 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 21.7 54% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	42x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	35x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $265Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	19x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	17x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 199 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $117Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,023

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16