Biostar B250GT5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar B250GT5  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170703
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '18 at 01:22
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 231
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 387
56% 409 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 36.3
26% 32.3 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 32.5
30% 37 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra II 500GB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 501
Write 326
Mixed 394
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 26.4
137% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 59.8
73% 120 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MK6465GSXN 640GB
583GB free
Firmware: GH101M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 82.9
Write 88.2
Mixed 85.9
65% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.34
82% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 23.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250GT5 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar B250GT5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $412
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback