Emachines G730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemEmachines G730  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines eMachines G730
Memory1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100503
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 22 '18 at 20:14
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 110
47% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 144
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Acer(1025 0382) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 4.28
4% 5.24 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 5.57
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 63.6
Mixed 35.8
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.22
60% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B2873EH1-CF8 830B NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 3GB
1066, 1334 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.5
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G730 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines G730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $41
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback