Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '18 at 19:13
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 194 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 675 62% 521 Pts	64-Core 902 56% 902 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Lighting 115 Reflection 115 Parallax 108 94% 113 fps	MRender 97.1 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8057767 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -41815801584225 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6553 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 742 (B1) Unknown 0 0 95 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 50 81607655456 (C2) HDA temperature 32 50 81607655456 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8057767 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8057767 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8057767 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 39283 (EA) Unknown 0 0 34953 (F1) Unknown 0 0 34953 (F2) Unknown 0 0 49193 (F4) Unknown 95 95 196673700	56.6% Above average	Read 511 Write 167 Mixed 241 67% 306 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 12 82% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 40.1 34% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 926GB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 103 (03) Spinup time 118 118 51579519587 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1532 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 53 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 35 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 42384 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1374 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1684 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1684 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 223339544607 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 53 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.1% Above average	Read 96.4 Write 99.3 Mixed 100 74% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.33 85% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 68%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 422GB free Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 188501112 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1206 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 9552997 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1519 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1068 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 76 76 24 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 505085982 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1209 (C2) HDA temperature 30 45 73014444062 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.4% Good	Read 105 Write 105 Mixed 109 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.16 51% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 2,519 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 24.6 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	82x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	77x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	42x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	41x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16