Dell Precision M6700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M6700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DKT5Y
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMar 20 '18 at 15:10
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 176
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 454
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
Dell(1028 053F) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 11
8% 9.69 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 11
Splatting 14
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 502
Write 409
Mixed 417
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 19.1
102% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 18
42% 82.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KN2M64-ETB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 KN2M64-ETB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6700 Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback