Gigabyte GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMar 20 '18 at 14:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 93.3
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 80.1
50% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 301
25% 218 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 1.72
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 4.78
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 291
Write 174
Mixed 192
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 11.5
72% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 11.9
21% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
855GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 91
Mixed 27
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.52
102% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback