PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P35-DS4 (all builds) |
Memory | 0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20090619 |
Uptime | 5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '18 at 09:38 |
Run Duration | 267 Seconds |
Run User | LTU-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATI HD 3650
Asus(1043 01E4) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.97.10.6
|
1.97%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.7%
Below average
|
||||
47.1%
Average
|
||||
46.9%
Average
|
||||
40%
Below average
|
||||
26.3%
Poor
|
||||
38.6%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 29x |
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 11x |
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 6x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $187 |