Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170802
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '18 at 23:35
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59 6,408 User benchmarks, average bench 51% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 58.1 2-Core 118 56% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 189 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Lighting 78.7 Reflection 78.8 Parallax 66.7 64% 74.7 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 73.7 59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8084 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2355 (64) Unknown 100 100 6941680 (65) Unknown 100 100 1070416 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 107 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 86 86 4212 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 608 (B7) Unknown 95 95 51 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 100 201864708130 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 90 90 10 (E9) Unknown 100 100 12771 (EA) Unknown 100 100 5879 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10689 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6117 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	49% Average	Read 456 Write 197 Mixed 192 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 6.76 60% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 61.7 DQ Mixed 6.43 16% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 480GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12897157306 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2787 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2476 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 588 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2792 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2792 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 167505100834 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 875	90.1% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 162 Mixed 155 118% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.22 92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 442GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 168 159 6566 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12431 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 30595 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5143 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 551 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 685539 (C2) HDA temperature 117 104 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 56 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.3% Average	Read 81.7 Write 75.8 Mixed 77 59% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.23 93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 69%
WD WD5000AZRZ-00HTKB0 500GB 1,537 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 430GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 138 3975 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7092 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8291 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2575 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 100 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 177 177 69708 (C2) HDA temperature 110 106 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	84.2% Excellent	Read 142 Write 151 Mixed 140 109% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.21 109% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 13.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11.8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	26x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	12x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 456 samples	3x
F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 197 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16