bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '18 at 07:52
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3615QM
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 142
56% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 336
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 256MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 13.2.43213.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 1.12
3% 2.57 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 7.39
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB (disk0).hdd
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.W84BW0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.8% Good
Read 495
Write 365
Mixed 388
92% 416 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 16.4
59% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 35.1
44% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 14.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback