Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 20:56
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 97.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
85% 147 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 567
62% 493 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 122
Parallax 109
92% 115 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 99.3
82% 101 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 95.6
Mixed 91.1
72% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.16
84% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST3320820AS_P 320GB
197GB free
Firmware: 3.BQE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 71.6
Write 73.9
Mixed 69.5
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.42
93% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
128GB free
Firmware: CR100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 58.1
Write 60.5
Mixed 56.5
44% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.35
84% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 44%
Lacie ST2000DM001-9YN1 4TB
3TB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 327
Write 335
Mixed 285
404% 315 MB/s
4K Read 2.95
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.41
110% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 129%
Great: 130%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 108
Write 115
Mixed 87.2
132% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.55
4K Mixed 0.24
98% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 21.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 47.5
84% 47.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback