Sony SVZ13115GGXI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSony SVZ13115GGXI  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120521
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '18 at 08:06
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 161
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 393
44% 343 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sony(104D 90A5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.961.1.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.81 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.52
4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
LaCie P9220 1TB
225GB free, PID 106d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 74.1
Mixed 56.2
85% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.33
73% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.0 128GB-$60
4GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 154
Write 22.5
Mixed 33.6
64% 70 MB/s
4K Read 9.81
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 4.44
541% 8.21 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 4.57
559% 8.68 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback