| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte Default string |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Champion-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160530 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 14 '18 at 01:18 |
| Run Duration | 223 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 0000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
|
60.7%
Good
|
52% 81.6 Pts
|
36% 300 Pts
|
33% 527 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
80.2%
Excellent
|
67% 125 fps
|
106% 131 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
||||
|
|
92%
Outstanding
|
113% 151 MB/s
|
108% 0.89 MB/s
| |
|
|
53.1%
Above average
|
72% 94.9 MB/s
|
68% 0.79 MB/s
| |
|
|
58.6%
Above average
|
79% 105 MB/s
|
98% 0.99 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HM400LI 400GB
308GB free
Firmware: 2TF00_00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
42% 55.3 MB/s
|
56% 0.49 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3400 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
88.7%
Excellent
|
101% 35.4 GB/s
|
32% 11 GB/s
|
51% 78.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-X99-SOC Champion-CF Builds (Compare 45 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Champion-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 19x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 6x |
| Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 6x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $670 |