Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161109
Uptime	16.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '18 at 01:40
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 89.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 240 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 991 88% 748 Pts	64-Core 1,627 101% 1,627 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.2% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 135 Parallax 141 98% 132 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 137 Splatting 115 98% 120 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320 2,669 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8819 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 195 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 20 (BE) vendor-specific 65 61 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 20 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15381546551	96.6% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 487 Mixed 504 112% 499 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 25.7 115% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 24 87% 189 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 140GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18208 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 556 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 342 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8561962773	106% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 488 Mixed 513 113% 505 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 39 132% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 170 171% 274 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 744GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 178 177 4075 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1625 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27166 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1615 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 103 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1521 (C2) HDA temperature 115 108 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	74.2% Very good	Read 141 Write 117 Mixed 118 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.44 121% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$174 2,758 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 318GB free Firmware: SD13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 1026217 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2871 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 15 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 203673695 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 31768 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 13 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 2884 (B8) Unknown 1 1 21926 (BB) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BC) Unknown 100 93 249111904316 (BD) vendor-specific 13 13 87 (BE) vendor-specific 69 62 554762271 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 34359738399 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 26 20 1026217 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47.1% Average	Read 84.1 Write 80 Mixed 73.7 60% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.36 83% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB-$65 2,716 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.3% Good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 21.9 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	201x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	171x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	178x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	90x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	64x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)