Supermicro X10SLL+-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro X10SLL+-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SLL+-F
Memory21.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 18:33
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 223
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 580
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3264) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.3.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 30.5
21% 28.1 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 32.8
22% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSTi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 446
Write 181
Mixed 217
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 14.4
76% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 47.7
83% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback