Intel D865GBF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemINTEL_ D865GBF_
MotherboardIntel D865GBF  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 13:05
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz
J2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Memory 17.9
1-Core 16.2
2-Core 30.1
13% 21.4 Pts
4-Core 30.1
8-Core 30.4
4% 30.2 Pts
64-Core 30.3
2% 30.3 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP0802N 80GB-$40
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TK100-30 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 42
Write 45.7
Mixed 24
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
512, 1024, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 337
12% 337 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback