Asus UX32A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus UX32A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX32A
Memory4.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 12:19
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 71
2-Core 124
57% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 2135) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2828
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 2.56
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2
Splatting 6.26
4% 4.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 522
Write 454
Mixed 425
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 21
90% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 82.8
101% 176 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 116%
Generic Mass-Storage 4GB
2GB free, PID 0225
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 8.98
Mixed 8.78
12% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.97
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 1.16
100% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX4GX3M1A1600C9 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.4
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX32A Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX32A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback