Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 12:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 397
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 397
24% 397 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8569) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 30.2
28% 32.7 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 31.7
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun 650 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT01B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 501
Write 423
Mixed 460
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 21.6
116% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 46.1
56% 101 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 89%
Hitach HUA722010CLA330 1TB
79GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 117
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL15-15-15 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback