Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 10:27
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 157
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 293
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Gigabyte(1458 229A) 3GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 51.2
34% 40.8 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 37.5
29% 35 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
149GB free
Firmware: ST1OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 97.3
Mixed 68.6
66% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.34
99% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 70.2
Write 72.3
Mixed 69.6
53% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.18
60% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback