HP EliteDesk 700 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 700 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8027
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 02:38
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 398
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 8027) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4568
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 6.53
3% 5.57 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.26
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 98.7
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.37
90% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
610GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 40.8
Mixed 37.3
51% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 700 G1 MT Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 700 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback