Asrock FM2A78M Pro3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M Pro3+  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '18 at 22:44
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 47.4
1-Core 65
2-Core 125
45% 79 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 175
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R7 240 Dual Graphics
MSI(1462 8094) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 9.06
6% 8.37 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 8.04
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 481
Write 352
Mixed 398
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 32.9
127% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 83.5
91% 156 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
17GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 83.2
Mixed 40.9
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.11
44% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
402GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 74.9
Write 59.5
Mixed 13.3
56% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.26
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 0
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M Pro3+ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M Pro3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $99
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback