Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '18 at 22:07
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 76.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 834
81% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 6.03
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 66.8
5% 50 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 76.3
28% 28 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 414
Mixed 415
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 43.5
160% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 83.6
92% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
278GB free
Firmware: HP74 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 97.5
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.44
96% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback