MSI MS-13F1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS30 2M Shadow
MotherboardMSI MS-13F1  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 10 '18 at 12:57
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 199
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 419
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1575 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Lighting 89.9
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 79.8
73% 86 fps
MRender 87.1
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 71.5
64% 79.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
USB 512GB
132GB free
Firmware: 0204
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 411
Write 337
Mixed 381
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 18.6
66% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 61
61% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 74%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
54GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 499
Write 167
Mixed 333
73% 333 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 28.3
136% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 101
124% 222 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83%
Great: 126%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 336GB
52GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 974
Write 387
Mixed 343
124% 568 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 17.8
51% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 57.4
77% 145 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 91%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 689GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.9% Good
Read 866
Write 187
Mixed 261
94% 438 MB/s
4K Read 5.43
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 17.1
36% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 47.9
74% 145 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 22.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-13F1 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-13F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback