| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus X99-M WS/SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170808 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 09 '18 at 19:24 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
72.6%
Very good
|
64% 103 Pts
|
48% 390 Pts
|
38% 613 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
|
22.7%
Poor
|
21% 29.1 fps
|
26% 32.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
201%
Outstanding
|
308% 1,398 MB/s
|
141% 51.5 MB/s
|
106% 180 MB/s
|
|
|
85%
Excellent
|
108% 144 MB/s
|
74% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
95.5%
Outstanding
|
106% 37.2 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
60% 66.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 12x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 10x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 5x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $615 |