Dell Vostro 3560

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemDell Vostro 3560  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 079JJR
Memory1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 09 '18 at 16:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 141
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 387
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 056E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 2.84
3% 4.15 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZMPC032HBCD-000D1 32GB
8GB free
Firmware: CXM13D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 353
Write 66.8
Mixed 139
40% 186 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 10.3
52% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 28.1
42% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 44%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 115
Mixed 106
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMT251S6CFR8C-PBHC TMT225S6CFR8C-PBHC 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vostro 3560 Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 3560

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback