Biostar A58MD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A58MD  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '18 at 00:51
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 112
54% 86 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 200
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-OEM
Sapphire(174B 5207) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 23.4
15% 23.5 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 24.3
20% 23.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 86.3
Mixed 31.1
51% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.18
46% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
24GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 14.6
Mixed 21.3
27% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.67
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 1.2
131% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58MD Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback