Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive579% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 07 '18 at 07:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 218
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 694
66% 544 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsn51t02du7 NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DC4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
579% Outstanding
Read 1,640
Write 3,376
Mixed 2,371
558% 2,462 MB/s
4K Read 272
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 266
908% 277 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 180
238% 430 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 579%
Great: 247%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
5GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 116
Write 25
Mixed 38.4
59% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.92
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.97
88% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB0-CPB 1x31GB
1 of 8 slots used
31GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2176 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback