Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X79-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140107
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMar 07 '18 at 02:50
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 80
40% 60.9 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 506
41% 357 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 67.2
28% 45.3 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 44.2
36% 43.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.4% Above average
Read 247
Write 245
Mixed 200
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 18.5
74% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 49
55% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 30.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback