Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 22:59
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 164
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 212
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310
Device(1B0A 9060) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 320.78
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.52 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Western Digitals 1TB
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 185
Mixed 126
128% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 3.23
4K Mixed 0.81
176% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
465GB free
Firmware: ES12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 104
Mixed 17.6
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.46
103% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 12.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback