Asus G75VW

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus G75VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G75VW
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration	355 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44% Average	Memory 68.5 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 57.9 37% 53 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 162 17% 135 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M 2,951 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 2119) 3GB Ram: 3GB, Driver: 310.61 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 2.09 2% 2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LAT-256M3S 256GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBA2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 245760 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 86927 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2270 (B2) Unknown 100 100 28 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 30 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82	66.8% Good	Read 466 Write 345 Mixed 380 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 20.1 75% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 83.1 DQ Mixed 19.5 34% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 464GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 2293766 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 144 144 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1886 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 5999 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1699 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4801 (C2) HDA temperature 229 229 231928365080 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 379 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	46.1% Average	Read 79 Write 81.7 Mixed 2.71 39% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.19 55% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 45%
Lexar JumpDrive 32GB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 28GB free, PID a817 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	5.06% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 4.81 Mixed 7.68 12% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.08 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 12% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.06% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 4x4GB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	348x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	248x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	342x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	276x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	66x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	61x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16