Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '16 at 16:28
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 233
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 942
86% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,334
83% 1,334 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Z (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 1078) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-512V2S-11 2.5 7mm 512GB
387GB free
Firmware: FC9110A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 520
Write 57
Mixed 104
48% 227 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.08
40% 9.31 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 105%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,505
Write 1,066
Mixed 1,530
305% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 126
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 51.1
295% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 46.8
58% 103 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 217%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 42.9
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 106%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback