Acer Aspire 6930ZG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 6930ZG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Makalu
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080925
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '16 at 16:00
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 29.9
27% 35.7 Pts
4-Core 46.9
8-Core 43.6
6% 45.2 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GS
Acer(1025 015E) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.2702
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 0.72
2% 2.18 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.48
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB2OC40C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 32.1
Mixed 4.88
16% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.15
4K Write 0.82
4K Mixed 0.15
38% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 35%
Mass Storage Device 320GB
192GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 25.9
Mixed 26.2
35% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.36
74% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 6930ZG Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire 6930ZG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback