Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 16:31
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 805
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 119
Parallax 105
91% 112 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 102
Splatting 85.3
77% 95 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
205GB free
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 467
Write 215
Mixed 325
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 23.9
129% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 63.2
101% 193 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 91%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,877
Write 980
Mixed 1,119
292% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 43.4
197% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 553
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 161
182% 319 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
976GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 86.1
Write 98.7
Mixed 83.2
67% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
398GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 163
Mixed 165
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.3
123% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
341GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 151
Write 161
Mixed 137
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.22
77% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
274GB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 110
Write 133
Mixed 112
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.62
102% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 75%
Innostor Innostor 32GB
30GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 119
Write 27.4
Mixed 25.5
54% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.13
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.23
42% 3.12 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 27.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback