Apple MacBookAir3,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookAir3,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942452F5819B1C1B
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '18 at 07:37
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9400
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Memory 24.7
1-Core 6.3
2-Core 17.1
12% 16 Pts
4-Core 17.2
8-Core 17.4
2% 17.3 Pts
64-Core 19.2
1% 19.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple TS064C 61GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJAA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 161
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 4.39
26% 9.56 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 6.25
8% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 46%
湮倯萇赽 TOSHIBA 8GB
6GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 7.45
Mixed 9.76
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.02
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.008
19% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
MC Read 1.8
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback