Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '18 at 02:22
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 79.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 236 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 864 80% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,266 78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3235) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1583 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.7% Good	Lighting 77.8 Reflection 111 Parallax 113 63% 100 fps	MRender 92 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 81.7 73% 90.4 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 13034070 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 21 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 60266981099707 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1053 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 416 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 65535 (C2) HDA temperature 36 42 38657458212 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13034070 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 21 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13034070 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13034070 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4423 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5589 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5589 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8197	54.1% Above average	Read 463 Write 225 Mixed 267 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 11.3 67% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 44.6 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 30.5 28% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 167GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 63 98955747 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1236 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 27329678 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1362 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 759 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 572588066 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1243 (C2) HDA temperature 34 17 73014444066 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 5 1 98955747 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -42206643616633 (F1) Unknown 100 253 14690406100 (F2) Unknown 100 253 9555120797	71.7% Very good	Read 129 Write 121 Mixed 123 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.2 78% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 33.6 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 29.5 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16