Asus M51AC

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130927
Uptime	14.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '18 at 19:52
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	ISL-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$99 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 172 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 310 39% 294 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Lighting 75.1 Reflection 73.5 Parallax 64.7 61% 71.1 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 69 56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 845DC EVO 960GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT03X3Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19766 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 758 (B1) Unknown 98 98 36 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 1 17521 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 50 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 213 (F1) Unknown 99 99 55153825667 (F2) Unknown 99 99 51776870007 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	80.9% Excellent	Read 507 Write 371 Mixed 447 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 19.3 115% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 33.3 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 105 79% 102 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G ASU16D3LU1KBG/4G 12GB 262 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	389x
Core i7-4770SIntel $112Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	125x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $86Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	78x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16