Asrock H110M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '18 at 16:40
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4500-$37
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 220
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
ASRock(1849 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 6.16
5% 7.44 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 14.2
8% 9.28 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB
462GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 112
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.34
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-025.A01G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback