Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '18 at 19:54
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 465
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1394 MHz, MLim: 1817 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 31
Parallax 39.2
0% 23.5 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 33.4
25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 8.77%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 504
Write 308
Mixed 334
84% 382 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 3.49
76% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 3.29
15% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
820GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 163
Mixed 139
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.3
99% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 121
Write 33.8
Mixed 40.7
66% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.58
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.81
84% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback