Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-DASHV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-DASHV  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160714
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '18 at 13:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 127
55% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 215
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 8.23
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 10.4
7% 9.27 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY XLR8 120GB-$150
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 524ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 252
Write 109
Mixed 148
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 5.29
45% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 5.21
20% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
325GB free
Firmware: JE3OA60A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 97
Mixed 86.5
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.18
73% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 18.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-DASHV Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-DASHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback