Axioo NEON HNM MODEL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAxioo NEON HNM MODEL  (all builds)
MotherboardAXIOO NEON HNM MODEL
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110624
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '18 at 08:27
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B940
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 98.8
50% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 98.7
13% 99.6 Pts
64-Core 99.3
6% 99.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9981) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXF 320GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GP005B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
43% Average
Read 75.2
Write 74.7
Mixed 78
57% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.26
69% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%
Hitachi HTS54323 320GB
152GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 23
Mixed 25.1
32% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.18
38% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown T2G88S1-H9M 878A T2G88S1-H9H 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NEON HNM MODEL Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Axioo NEON HNM MODEL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback