Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '18 at 19:30
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 455
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 187
Parallax 209
105% 175 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 185
Splatting 128
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 250GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PWG4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 478
Write 312
Mixed 362
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 15.8
69% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 75
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 25.1
29% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 65%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 28.9
Mixed 27.6
23% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.36
4K Mixed 0.48
188% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
971GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 155
Write 131
Mixed 140
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.18
82% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
153GB free
Firmware: 12.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 71.7
Mixed 73.4
53% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.37
103% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback